- Added support for "stacked" extbans. Put simply this allows extban combinations
such as ~q:~c:#test to only silence users on #test, for example. This feature
is enabled by default, but can be disabled during ./Config -advanced.
This feature was suggested by Shining Phoenix (#0003193), was then coded
by aquanight for U3.3, and later on backported and partially redone by Syzop.
Module coders:
In an extban ~x:~y:something where we call ~x the 1st, and ~y the 2nd extban:
Since stacked extbans only makes sense where the 1st one is an action
extended ban like ~q/~n/~j, most modules won't have to be changed, as
their extban never gets extended (just like ~c:~q: makes no sense).
However, you may still want to indicate in some cases that the extban your
module introduces also shouldn't be used as 2nd extban.
For example with a textban extban ~T it makes no sense to have ~n:~T.
The module can indicate this by setting EXTBOPT_NOSTACKCHILD in
the ExtbanInfo struct used by ExtbanAdd().
For completeness I note that action modifier extbans are indicated by
EXTBOPT_ACTMODIFIER. However, note that we currently assume all such
extbans use the extban_is_ok_nuh_extban and extban_conv_param_nuh_or_extban
functions. If you don't use these and use EXTBOPT_ACTMODIFIER, then things
will go wrong with regards to stack-counting.
Module coders should also note that stacked extbans are not available if
DISABLE_STACKED_EXTBANS is defined.
- Added extended ban ~R:<nick>, which only matches if <nick> is a registered
user (has identified to services). This is really only useful in ban
exemptions, like: +e ~R:Nick would allow Nick to go through all bans if he
has identified to NickServ. This is often safer than using +e n!u@h.
- Added Extended Invex. This is very much like extended bans, in fact it
supports some of the same flags. Syntax: +I ~character:mask
Currently supported are: ~c (channel), ~r (realname) and ~R (registered).
This can be useful when setting a channel invite only (+i) and then
setting invite exceptions such as +I ~c:#chan (or even ~c:+#chan), while
still being able to ban users.
Because action modifiers (~q/~n/~j) make no sense here, extended invex
stacking (+I ~a:~b:c) makes no sense either, and is not supported.
Suggested by DanPMK (#0002817), parts based on patch from ohnobinki.
Module coders: set EXTBOPT_INVEX in the ExtbanInfo struct used by
ExtbanAdd() to indicate that your extban may also be used in +I.
- Invex (+I) now always checks cloaked hosts as well. Just like with bans,
it checks them also when the user is not currently cloaked (eg: did -x, or
is currently using some VHOST).
- Fixed client desynch caused by (un)banning, reported by Sephiroth (#2837).
two groups: one that specifies ban actions (~q/~n/~j) and one that
introduces new criteria (~c/~r). Also added documentation for ~R which
does not exist yet, but will soon...
- Added information about ``oper::password::auth-type sslclientcert'' and the same for link::password-receive::auth-type. (#3133)
- A little bit more of interlinking and using id="" instead of <a name="" />
curl version is new enough and is not using a c-ares which is binary
incompatible. If the self-compiled curl version is (too) outdated, then we
now suggest to rename it and have the installer re-download and compile
it automatically. This avoids some potential crashes.
was not compiled with c-ares, which is clearly a bad idea as then the
entire IRCd can hang for several seconds or more...
We now check if they support asynch DNS, and skip them if they don't.
binki